Carlos Gimeno Valero vs Nerman Fatic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
C. Gimeno Valero vs N. Fatic

Carlos Gimeno Valero

ESP

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'3" (191 cm)

Height

6'3" (191 cm)

719

C. Rank

240

259

Best Rank

191

Total Titles

Ytd Titles

$4.0K

Career Money

$74.0K

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Nerman Fatic

BIH

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'3" (191 cm)

Height

6'3" (191 cm)

719

C. Rank

240

259

Best Rank

191

Total Titles

Ytd Titles

$4.0K

Career Money

$74.0K

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-To-Head: Valero 1 - 0 Fatic

They have played 2 sets in total, with Carlos Gimeno Valero winning 2 and Nerman Fatic winning 0. The last match between Carlos Gimeno Valero and Nerman Fatic was at the Zagreb Challenger, 11-05-2022, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Carlos Gimeno Valero getting the victory 6-3 6-1.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Valero	1
Fatic	0

Last H2H Matches:

(R2) Zagreb Challenger(05-11-22)

Stats

Carlos Gimeno Valero

Nerman Fatic

C. G. Valero vs N. Fatic H2H Profile

C. G. Valero	Stats	N. Fatic
$3,960	Career Prize Money	$73,995
65.10% (125-67)	Career Total W/L	58.35% (395-282)
1	Clay	0
7	Titles	11
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0.00% (0-1)

C. G. Valero vs N. Fatic Match Preview

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Carlos Gimeno Valero has won 15.38% of points on their second serve, while Nerman Fatic has won 44.03%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Carlos Gimeno Valero, in recent form, has won 29.41% of their opponent's second serve points, while Nerman Fatic has won 43.50%. The same stats for first serve returns are 12.50% and 28.85% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Carlos Gimeno Valero has saved 42.86% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nerman Fatic has saved 55.84% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Carlos Gimeno Valero has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 1), with Nerman Fatic winning 74.60% (W/L 0/ 16) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Carlos Gimeno Valero has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 8/ 4), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1). Nerman Fatic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 335/ 216), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
Player level: In the last year, Carlos Gimeno Valero has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 0.00% of matches (W/L 0/ 1), where as Nerman Fatic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 22/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Carlos Gimeno Valero winning 1 times and Nerman Fatic being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Carlos Gimeno Valero winning 2 and Nerman Fatic winning 0. The last match between Carlos Gimeno Valero and Nerman Fatic was at the Zagreb Challenger, 11-05-2022, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Carlos Gimeno Valero getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:17:39.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Carlos Gimeno Valero has played against opponents with an average rank of 387 while Nerman Fatic has played against players with an average rank of 353.73.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Carlos Gimeno Valero has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nerman Fatic has won 94% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Carlos Gimeno Valero has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nerman Fatic has converted 34.81% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Carlos Gimeno Valero vs Nerman Fatic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

C. G. Valero vs N. Fatic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

C. G. Valero	Stats	N. Fatic
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	4
6	Total Double Faults	2
1:17:39	Avg. Match Time	1:17:39
64% (28/44)	1st Serve %	60% (36/60)
82% (23/28)	1st Serve Win %	44% (16/36)
50% (8/16)	2nd Serve Win %	46% (11/24)
42% (5/12)	Break Pts Won %	33% (1/3)
55% (33/60)	Return Pts Won %	30% (13/44)
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won → Match Won	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won → Match Lost	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost → Match Won	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

C. G. Valero Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Perugia Challenger - 09-06-2025
Q1 Oriol Roca BatallaO. Roca	L	6-1 6-2	Stats
Troyes Challenger - 01-07-2024
Q3 Neil OberleitnerN. Oberleitner	L	6-2 6-3	Stats
Q1 Paulo Saraiva Dos SantosP. Saraiva	W	3-6 6-4 7-5	Stats
M25 Cordoba - 03-06-2024
R2 Andrea GuerrieriA. Guerrieri	L	6-2 6-0	Stats
R1 Jaime CaldesJ. Caldes	W	6-4 6-3	Stats

View All

N. Fatic Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Davis Cup, Group I, 1R, ECU-BIH 3-2 - 08-09-2025
Rubber 2 Alvaro Guillen MezaA. Guillen	L	6-4 7-6(0)	Stats
Sofia 1 Challenger - 11-08-2025
SF Zdenek KolarZ. Kolar	L	6-0 ret.	Stats
QF Sebastian GimaS. Gima	W	6-2 6-2	Stats
R2 Luciano Emanuel AmbrogiL. Emanuel	W	6-3 6-2	Stats
R1 Kilian FeldbauschK. Feldbausch	W	6-7(4) 6-4 6-2	Stats

View All

C. G. Valero vs N. Fatic Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

C. G. Valero	Stats	N. Fatic
65.10% (125/67)	YTD Win/Loss	58.35% (395/282)
61.30% (274/173)	Sets Win/Loss	57.34% (871/648)
55.04% (2172/1774)	Games Win/Loss	52.95% (7438/6608)
66.67% (8/4)	Hard Win/Loss	50.62% (41/40)
65.17% (116/62)	Clay Win/Loss	60.80% (335/216)
50.00% (1/1)	Indoor Hard W/L	44.19% (19/24)
0% (0/0)	Grass Win/Loss	0.00% (0/2)
0.09	Aces Per Game	0.22
168	Aces Total	1524
0.48	Double Faults Per Game	0.22
925	Total Double Faults	1482
1:35:46	Average Match Time	1:19:41
249.69	Average Opponent Rank	510.46
69% (8537/12346)	1st Serve %	67% (23258/34907)
63% (5337/8537)	1st Serve Win %	65% (15200/23258)
44% (1671/3809)	2nd Serve Win %	48% (5586/11649)
48% (819/1699)	Break Points Won % (Total)	47% (1915/4096)
47% (5975/12635)	Return Points Win %	43% (15212/35219)
0% (0/0)	Slam W/L	20.00% (1/4)
0.00% (0/2)	Masters W/L	0.00% (0/1)
0% (0/0)	Cups W/L	40.00% (4/6)
33.33% (1/2)	Main Tour W/L	25.00% (3/9)
58.33% (42/30)	Challenger W/L	53.21% (116/102)
71.30% (82/33)	Futures W/L	62.88% (271/160)
66% (120/181)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	59% (386/650)
25% (1/4)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/3)
51% (19/37)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	51% (79/154)
58% (38/65)	Deciding Set Win %	54% (101/186)
83% (126/105)	1st Set Won, Won Match	88% (385/340)
16% (126/20)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	11% (385/41)
27% (66/18)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	19% (292/56)